My first attempts at digital microphotography used an IBM 'PC Camera'
USB webcam. Using a CMOS imager chip with a 320 x 240
resolution, it's certainly not the best imager available on
the market, but I happened to have one handy in my junk box.
Some websites have reported success using a jeweler's loupe magnifier
as a macro lens, attaching it to a digital point-and-shoot camera.
I started my experiments with a 5x loupe, but quickly found that the
webcam itself could be focused on objects a mere 1/4" away from the front
of the focus ring. Using the camera's maximum resolution, and viewing
the image on a monitor set to 1024 x 768, this yielded a magnification
of 12x. Adding the loupe actually decreased the magnification, since I
had to hold the subject further away from the lens. Here's some images
captured with the camera alone:
Tip of ballpoint pen
Back of electrical connector package
Pocket lining complete with lint
The back of my hand
My finger
My fingertip
These images were taken with available light (fluorescent), and are
unprocessed.
While 12x is by no means a 'high' magnification, the scale does lend itself well to imaging
such subjects as flowers, insects, and other small subjects. A support
for the camera, adjustable lighting, and a stage to support the subject
would all likely make for better images due to better control of the
focus and light. The depth of focus is very small, and this makes it
a challenge to hold the webcam by hand while taking images.
For reference, here's the ballpoint pen using the camera with the focus set
to infinity, and a 5x jeweler's loupe:
Ballpoint pen, webcam with 5x loupe
Time for some higher magnification. For this series, I used the webcam
again with focus at infinity, held to the eyepiece of a 30x toy
microscope:
Ballpoint pen, webcam and 30x microscope
This method of camera-microscope coupling is known as afocal. It tends
to suffer heavily from vignetting, the black circle around the field of
view, but is handy because it requires very little to no modification
of either the camera or optical instrument. This method can also be
used with telescopes and binoculars.
Here's the collection of eqiupment used so far:
They are an IBM "PC Camera" USB webcam (upper right), an "Uncle Milton
Scope It Out" 30x portable microscope (left), and a 5x jeweler's
loupe (lower right).
The next step was to try the webcam with a standard compound microscope,
in this case an
Edmund Scientific beginner microscope. These images were taken with an
unmodified webcam by simply holding the webcam up to the eyepiece, a technique known as
'afocal':
Bee mouthparts, at 40x, 100x, and 400x
These images suffer from severe vignetting, an effect caused in
this case by having the webcam lens too far away from the microscope
eyepiece (the case of the webcam prevented holding the lens any
closer). They also show the difficulty of exactly aligning the
webcam with the optical axis of the eyepiece, resulting in off-center
images.
The answer to the vignetting problem here is to move the webcam lens
closer to the eyepiece. Since the IBM PC Camera's plastic snout
got in the way, I removed it with a hacksaw, and blew the plastic dust
off the lens with some canned compressed air. This allows a vast
improvement. This shot was taken with the webcam hand-held:
Bee mouthparts, 40x, modified webcam
To simply image-taking, I added a mechanical adapter to the webcam. This
was made from a 1.25" PVC pipe cap, with a hole drilled in the center. The
cap was glued to the webcam with epoxy. An inner liner of corregated cardboard
was attached with superglue. This allows the webcam to be slipped over the
microscope eyepiece and remain stable:
Webcam modified to attach to microscope
The adapter makes the webcam much easier to use, since it keeps the camera
aligned and centered over the eyepiece:
Modified webcam attached to microscope
Here's an image taken with the new
setup. These are particles removed from melted snow with a magnet:
Rounded ferrous objects, 400x
These might be micrometeorites, but are more likely 'fly-ash' (small round
particles that result when coal is burned).
While encouraging, looking at the image it now becomes clear that the resolution
of the camera becomes a limiting factor.